"Liberal intellectual" Noam Chomsky said that anyone who refused to participate in the experimental covid injection program should be exiled, stripped of their "civil rights", and starved into submission:
"They should have the decency to remove themselves from the community. If they refuse to do that, then measures have to be taken to safeguard the community from them... Then comes the practical question: How can we get food to them? Well, that's actually their problem." informationliberation.com/?id=62627
"Chomsky told a forum in New York in December, 1967 that in Mao's China “one finds many things that are really quite admirable"...only five years after the end of the great Chinese famine of 1958–62...with a total death toll of 30,000,000 people..." -- Keith Windschuttle, "The Hypocrisy of Noam Chomsky" newcriterion.com/issues/2003/5/the-hypocrisy-of-noam-chomsky
But wait, the establishment and mainstream media adore him, so how can that be? Just kidding. You've got him dead to rights here, John. Chomsky may have a brilliant intellect, but he's a fanatical extremist and that tells us a lot about those who give him easy public platforms with only softball questions. Nice one, and thanks.
we had to read Chomsky in university and his gibberish on language is phenomenal. it's so difficult to understand what he wants to say (there you go, mr. language expert) that often we'd just burst out laughing. tq mr. Payette for bringing this up!
Thank you, Dave! Given your comments on Chomsky, I think you will especially appreciate the piece I am working on now in which I delve more deeply into those self-contradictions.
"Liberal intellectual" Noam Chomsky said that anyone who refused to participate in the experimental covid injection program should be exiled, stripped of their "civil rights", and starved into submission:
"They should have the decency to remove themselves from the community. If they refuse to do that, then measures have to be taken to safeguard the community from them... Then comes the practical question: How can we get food to them? Well, that's actually their problem." informationliberation.com/?id=62627
"Chomsky told a forum in New York in December, 1967 that in Mao's China “one finds many things that are really quite admirable"...only five years after the end of the great Chinese famine of 1958–62...with a total death toll of 30,000,000 people..." -- Keith Windschuttle, "The Hypocrisy of Noam Chomsky" newcriterion.com/issues/2003/5/the-hypocrisy-of-noam-chomsky
But wait, the establishment and mainstream media adore him, so how can that be? Just kidding. You've got him dead to rights here, John. Chomsky may have a brilliant intellect, but he's a fanatical extremist and that tells us a lot about those who give him easy public platforms with only softball questions. Nice one, and thanks.
we had to read Chomsky in university and his gibberish on language is phenomenal. it's so difficult to understand what he wants to say (there you go, mr. language expert) that often we'd just burst out laughing. tq mr. Payette for bringing this up!
Thank you, Dave! Given your comments on Chomsky, I think you will especially appreciate the piece I am working on now in which I delve more deeply into those self-contradictions.
Thank you, Margaret. Yes, I will definitely look forward to that one.