Smart Cities for Dummies
Supplemental: A crash course via excerpts from three great authors.
This post is supplemental to the one below on the Campaign for Freedom March that took place in Oxford on Saturday, February the 18th, 2023. As that post explains, we were protesting Oxford County Council’s attempt to control and limit rights of residents to travel beyond a fifteen minute radius in their cars more than X number of times per year. Yes, really!
The Oxford power play is also being pursued in Canterbury. Both are part of a global coup aimed at implementing so-called Smart Cities, or rather Enslavement Cities, throughout the world, turning our lives and liberties irreparably on their head. For this supplemental article, I decided to extensively quote relevant excerpts on Smart Cities and related subject-matter from excellent books I have read from the following notable authors: Dr. Vernon Coleman, Patrick M. Wood, and David Icke.
Although I do not know any of these authors personally, I know in my heart, they will not mind me doing this, and if this assumption proves to be incorrect, I’ll make the subsequent changes at that time. Dr. Vernon Coleman, for instance, makes all his books of late freely available on PDF, in addition to selling them, so you can guess from that where his priorities are.
I’ll also include some additional photos from Saturday’s demonstration to help break up the text up a bit.
Finally, before I continue, if you really want to understand what Big Tech is capable of, what it is doing to us, and who controls it, read Harvard Professor Shoshana Zuboff’s, ‘The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power’. Although it has no dedicated chapter to Smart Cities, it is all about Smart Cities, and much more. The book requires a 500-page-small-print commitment, but it’s worth it. I consider it the definitive book on today’s Big Tech.
Onwards…
Excerpts from ‘End Game: The Hidden Agenda 21’ by Vernon Coleman
Smart -
The word ‘smart’ (as applied to meters, cities and so on) is often applied to anything which removes all your rights and privacy, and gives those rights to the Agenda 21 cultists.
Smart cities (smart growth zones) -
Part of the Agenda 21 plan is to move all citizens into huge (or ‘mega’) cities. China has already started doing this. People are forced from rural and suburban areas into high rise flats. This is all rather reminiscent of the highland clearances.
Citizens from rural communities will be forced into the smart cities by a complex combination of positive and negative incentives. There will be grants, tax credits and housing benefits to persuade people to move into cities. And in the countryside, rural properties will be condemned, seized and demolished. The building of new roads and railway lines and sewage treatment facilities to serve the new cities will be used as an excuse for confiscation and demolition.
Re-wilding plans will also be used to force people out of the countryside as will huge dams. In China, the Yangtze dam displaced millions of people rom rural areas to smart cities.
In addition, there will be very few or no rural services with fire brigade, ambulance services and postal services all being ended in rural areas.
Poor broadband will make it increasingly difficult for people to live in rural areas as more and more of our lives become dependent upon the internet. Rural roads will be left un-mended and bus and train services to rural areas will be cut even further. Farms will no longer be needed as naturally grown food is replaced with artificial food made in factories. Bill Gates’ plan to block out the sun will damage farming.
In the UK, the plans are already well in hand to create these smart cities.
Under cover of 2020’s manufactured crisis, the Government introduced new planning legislation. Development in England will in future be concentrated on brown field sites in 20 selected cities in the Midlands and the North. Building will only be allowed in places such as Birmingham, Bradford, Leeds and Stoke. These are to be the new, smart cities. Once land has been declared ‘unprotected’ it will enjoy a ‘presumption of favour’ of planning permission. This marks the end of local democracy.
In January 2021, it was reported that seven of the largest cities in the UK were experiencing a property boom.
Those commentators who have noticed this dramatic change in the way England is organised have been rather indignant, but, as far as I know, none of them has noticed that this is connected to the Agenda 21 plan for smart cities. Indeed, these are largely the same commentators who regard those of us worried about Agenda 21 as ‘conspiracy theorists’ and then dismiss us as ‘discredited lunatics’.
The Agenda 21 supporters claim that the smart cities will give us a healthier way of life. We will be able to walk or cycle everywhere we need to go. We will not need to travel because there will be nowhere to go outside our city and since all cities will be the same what would be the point in going to another city? Pollution will drop because no one (except the bureaucrats who will need to travel about to make sure we are being obedient) will have a motor car.
Apartments in the high rise towers will be cheap to rent because they will be small (and poorly built). There will be little need for energy for heating. No one will have a garden so there won’t be any need to waste water growing grass, flowers or vegetables. The weather will be controlled so there will never be any snow or ice. It will rain at night. There will be no police and no crime because everyone will be watching everyone else to make sure that they behave, and drones and robots will be watching us all to make sure we report any law-breaking we observe.
Smart Meters -
Homes are being fitted with smart meters which are allegedly being introduced to help consumers save money.
However, although a smart meter is extremely unlikely to save more than a few pennies, it might kill you. The risks to human health are so real that in France, a court ordered the removal of some smart meters because people had been made ill by them.
Moreover, it now seems that a new sort of smart meter will have to be installed on the near future. So existing smart meters will have to be removed and, presumably, dumped.
In the UK, the Government is reviewing plans to give electricity companies the power to cut off electricity supplies without warning or compensation. A particular target will be users of large amounts of electricity in homes. Electric vehicle charging points and central heating systems are particularly likely to be targeted. Smart meters will make it easy for electricity companies to cut off electricity supplies to individual homes. Dissidents will find that their electricity supplies disappear.
Excerpts from ‘Technocracy: The Hard Road to Word Order’ by Patrick M. Wood
The Smart City Steamroller -
“In the end, the smart city will destroy democracy. Like Google, they’ll have enough data not to have to ask you what you want.” Leo Hollis
When it comes to the term “Smart City”, what does smart mean? A city is a thing but is full of people; does it mean that all the people who live there are smart? Not likely. The most common thinking is that it is used as a contrast against the world “dumb”, where a smart city does things in an intelligent way but non-smart cities are reckoned to be dumb, backward or ignorant. This is actually a clever marketing nudge to get people to think favorably about the term without having the slightest idea of what it really means. After all, who wants to live in a “dumb city”? Of course, we all want our city to be smart!
To the global corporate giants who are relentlessly promoting and designing today’s smart cities, S.M.A.R.T. is a commonly used acronym in project management jargon that stands for Specific Measurable, Attainable, Relevant and Timely. Once you see this, you cannot unsee it: the global behemoths view the city as nothing more than a technology project where the herd of inhabitants must be micromanaged to achieve Attainable and Relevant goals in a Timely manner. As expected, monitoring technology and ubiquitous data collection are always woven into the city’s fabric in order to provide Measurable results.
It is helpful at this point to remember The Technocrat’s 1938 definition of Technocracy:
Technocracy is the science of social engineering, the scientific operation of the entire social mechanism to produce and distribute goods and services to the entire population…
In short, smart city dogma is an application of the “science of social engineering.” The target is the entire social unit, in this case, the city. The object is to provide goods and services to all of its inhabitants.
Who are these global corporations that champion smart cities? Here are a few notable leaders: IBM, Cisco, Siemens, Huawei, Microsoft, Nvidia, Hitachi and Oracle. For instance, Siemens’ website states:
Urbanization, climate change, and globalization are posing multiple challenges to cities and city stakeholders. Ensuring mobility, improving energy efficiency, and increasing the economic value of buildings are among the main priorities when it comes to creating and managing urban infrastructure. Through digitalization, we enable cities to optimize the performance of buildings, transport and energy systems, while ensuring the safety and security of people and assets.
A 2013 press release from IBM notes that,
IBM is helping cities around the world use the vast amount of information already available to deliver more efficient citizen services. IBM’s experience with cities continuously fuels more effective solutions and best practices to help city leaders transform their communities.
A blog article on Nividia’s website declares,
Alibaba and Huawei join more than 50 of the world’s leading companies already using NVIDIA Metropolis. Together, we’re taking advantage of more than 1 billion video cameras that will be in our cities by the year 2020 to solve a dizzying array of problems.
You should get the idea that there is a feeding frenzy among smart city players to capture as much as possible of the $600 billion per year market. This is a market growing an an estimated twenty-four percent per year, that will reach $2 trillion by 2023. The prestigious Mordor Intelligence further describes the scenario:
Smart Cities and the Internet of Things (IoT) are on their way to transform modern life. Smart Cities make effective use of IoT. IoT instills the required intelligence into basic building blocks of the city, and helps make it smart. In 2017, Smart Cities occupied major share in IoT. Smart cities is expected to utilize IoT to monitor energy usage, traffic flows, and water levels etc. The effective use of IoT in Smart Cities is totally reliant on the infrastructure development, and smart supply chain. [Emphasis added.]
The ambition of Smart City Technocrats must not be trivialized. They intend to “transform modern life” by integrating data collected from all devices connected to the so-called Internet of Things, into AI programs that act as control centers for various city functions.
What is the Internet of Things (IoT)? It is a network of physical devices such as appliances, smartphones, vehicles, sensors, actuators, RFID embedded chips, surveillance cameras, license plate readers, listening devices, etc. These devices receive and transmit data via WiFi or cellular connection.
In one article, “NVIDIA’s plan to turn data from 500 million cameras into AI gold”, it is noted that there will be one billion surveillance cameras installed globally by 2020.(DP: actually the CCP has close to that many now in 2023.) That’s one camera for every seven or eight humans on earth! The amount of data generated from these cameras is incomprehensible, but using advanced AI tuned especially for images and running on its computer chips, NVIDIA will give its city-clients tools to track everyone, everywhere and in real time.
The Smart Grid initiative started in 2009 by President Barack Obama kick started the IoT for energy. By now, most Americans have seen WiFi-enabled Smart Meters installed in their homes and businesses. These meters are a gateway to collect data from energy-consuming appliances and also transmit commands to regulate them. Theoretically, every refrigerator washer, dryer, thermostat, motor, computer or TV can be monitored continuously and simultaneously by your local utility and anyone else they choose to send your data to.
As autonomous vehicles gain market influence, the will be connected to a central control point but also to each other as they move about on city streets. Immense amounts of data will be collected and analyzed in real time.
Smartphones are already connecting hundreds of millions of people with not only other people but also with their inanimate devices like health and fitness tracking and smart home devices, their cars, sound systems, etc.
Collectively, all these devices are considered the IoT, which Mordor claims “instills the required intelligence into the basic building blocks of the city, and helps make it smart.” Building blocks, large or small, are the elements that construct a city from the top down and bottom up, using advanced technology as the mortar.
This is exactly how these giant tech companies appraoch the problem of city design and urban planning.
I fact, entire cities are being created from scratch to show case Smart City technology. The city of Songdo was founded in 2003 as a public-private partnership with a Free Economic Zone (FEZ) in South Korea. It sits on 1,400 acres, has room for 250,000 citizens, all of whom will be under constant surveillance by 500 cameras. It is also home to the United Nations’ Global Institute for Green Growht. Songdo is called the “City of the Future”. The “World’s Smartest City” and “Korea’s High-Tech Utopia.” After 15 years of constant development however, Songdo only has a population of 70,000 to enjoy its ubiquitous Internet and built-in video wall communication centers.
Critics have less than glowing assessments for Songdo. The International New town Institute based in the Netherlands sates,
“These cities (Songdo) look like the CIAM-inspired modernist cities from the 1960s - as if we’ve learned nothing over the last half-century of urban planning innovation. This topology was, indeed once seen as a panacea for cities everywhere, but is now considered a failed model that has cost some communities a heavy price. Many sociologists and historians now blame this model for rising crime rates, social exclusion, limited access to public amenities and heightened class divisions.”
CIAM refers to the Congrès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne that operated between 1928 and 1959, and where famous architects of the day posed as urban planners. CIAM projects failed miserably and its entire urban design philosophy was largely discredited. Leading intellectuals of the day heavily promoted CIAM as a new approach to planning human settlements: Barbara Ward, Margaret Mead, Buckminster Fuller, and Arnold Toynbee.
The New Town institute finally concluded that “the planned towns and cities we now see coming up across Asia and Africa are almost exclusively for the wealthy.”
In 2017, Bill gates committed $80 million to create a smart city called Belmont in the Arizona desert west of Phoenix. Forty square miles of sand and desert flora will be transformed into a high-tech metropolis of 160,000 inhabitants. According to a press release, Belmont will be
A forward-thinking community with a communication and infrastructure spine that embraces cutting-edge technology, designed around high-speed digital networks, data centers, new manufacturing technologies and distribution models, autonomous vehicles and autonomous logistics hubs.
The official term coined by Technocrats to refer to Smart Cities is urbanates, and this is where history meets the future. The few original Technocrats remaining from the last century who were associated with Technocracy Inc., have argued with this writeer that their pure form of Technocracy has nothing to do with the modern implementation of Technocracy via globalization, Agenda 21, 2030 Agenda or Sustainable Development. Their protest is nonsense. While there is little doubt that these early Technocrats had any modern ties to tech giants like IBM or NVIDIA, their own literature gives a succinct definition of urbanates:
Small size ( perhaps 20,000-100,000 people)
Planed, top-down design
Pre-installed, integrated transportation, utilities, and communications.
Safe, pollution free enviornment
No more traffic jams, smog, long travel times, and lack of parking spaces, which are just some of the benefits of urbanates. Their overall design philosophy is scientific, and their final design will provide the citizens living in them with these advantages in accord with the goals of Technocratic living. By being planned from the start, Urbanates do not constantly expand in random fashion that necessitates the use of inefficient forms of transportation, such as the automobile. Urbanates would instead employ a functional and convenient form of mass-transit that may resemble a cross between a subway system and elevators. Combined with its small size making most destination within walking distance, transportation in an Urbanate would be quick and worry free. They would also contain all of the distribution, health care, education, and recreation centers that would be needed and desired by the population of these cities of the future.
An insightful book, Against The Smart City by Adam Greenfield, analyzes the modern Smart City and concludes,
The notion of the smart city in its full contemporary form appears to have originated within these businesses, rather than with any party, group or individual, recognized for their contributions to the theory or practice of urban planning. That is, the enterprises enumerated here are to a surprisingly great degree responsible for producing both the technical system on which the smart city is founded and the rhetoric that binds them together as a conceptual whole.
As a respected urban planning expert, Greenfield further explains that the ideas at the core of today’s Smart City practice originated during the eighty years between 1880 and 1960 when the so-called “high-modernism” in urban planning was incubated, hatched and ultimately failed:
The descriptions of the serene and masterful guidance of the city-as-machine-for-living we hear about from Siemens or Cisco or IBM are strikingly reminiscent of LeCorbusier (CIAM). What we see in the smart-city material across the board is straight and occasionally even naive rendition of tropes that were taken to pieces fifty years ago.
The point of this discussion is to clearly show that the modern Smart City theory and practice is not revolutionary thinking as is claimed by its proponents, but rather is hijacked from failed theory and practice from the last century. Today’s Smart Cities will not and indeed cannot, deliver on their promise of urban Utopia.
Nevertheless, given the power and intent within the big-tech companies, we marvel at how successful their propaganda has been to sell Smart Cities as the cities of the future, boldly going where no society has gone before. If history is guide, this will not end well for people living in those cities.
Who is paying for all this new or retrofitted construction of Smart Cities? Certainly not the cities themselves! In the United States, cities are already swamped with debt, unfunded liabilities, and deferred maintenance projects on roads, bridges, sewer, water, etc. The Hoover Institution estimates that the unfunded urban pension liabilities alone amount to $3,846 trillion. This compares to total municipal bond debt of $3.7 trillion that certainly must be serviced as a top priority. Both of these figures are unquestionably much larger as of 2018. (DP: Imagine the in the Covid era in 2023!) The combined city infrastructure deficit (deferred maintenance) is estimated between $1.2 and $3.5 trillion, but this is very subjective because no one really knows how many projects could be launched if funds were actually available. U.S. household debt accumulated by citizens who inhabit these same American cities has risen to over $13 trillion. A quick calculation of all this city and personal debt indicates that every man, woman, and child wakes up each morning with over $60,000 in liability - and this does not include any county state or federal debts!
Essentially, cities are completely unable to launch new infrastructure projects being sold by Smart City hucksters. So, if funding cannot come from the cities themselves, where is it coming from? Capital investments.
[The book continues]
Smart Cities are Special -
Smart cities raise a series of problems. First of all, the right to privacy is entirely redefined in a smart city, as they create an environment where we are no longer expected to consent to the collecting, processing, and sharing of our data but instead the minute we step in the streets we are exposed to both government and corporate surveillance. And not only is there no opting out but more likely than not you will not even know that data about you is being collected.
Smart Cities are being inundated with technology way beyond just biometric camera systems. Driven by Big Tech, cities are adopting sensor technology that will measure every aspect fo city life. Sensors are being built into light poles, street corners, bus and train stops, public service vehicles and neighborhoods. Smart Grid technology monitors all usage of electricity, natural gas and water. Smart buildings are being retrofitted with sensors that monitor everything that happens on every floor, from person movement to elevators to air conditioning. Collectively, this adequately showcases the so-called “Internet of Things” (IoT) that will come to life as 5G wireless technology is rolled out. In fact, the IoT is Smart City technology!
The Chief Technology Officer of Teradata, a major data analytics provider, stated,
“The bottom line is that sensor technology in the IoT context is key. When I say IoT context I mean that we get a view of the whole city across these different domains of the life of the city as it’s captured in the sensor data.”
The IoT, sometimes called the Internet of Everything, literally connects everything into a single database with multiple viewing angles. To all of the things mentioned above, add smart phones, laptop computers, routers, credit or debit card readers, store transactions, items tagged with RFID chips, and so on.
Most Smart City ‘designers’ have worried about the one thing that could block their implementation efforts: lack of connectivity. This risk is completely nullified with the new 5G wireless communication standard that will be fully rolled out to America by the end of 2019. 5G is far more than just a smart phone carrier. It will allow any physical device to be data-integrated at speeds approaching fiber optic. 5G is 23 times faster than 4G technology, approaching 50 gigabytes per second. However, the real breakthrough in 5G has to do with “latency”, or the turnaround time to initiate a transfer. With 4G, typical latency is 50 milliseconds. 5G turns the same packet around in 1 millisecond! This is an improvement of 50 times.
When the IoT is fully enabled with 5G technology, the entire data feed, no matter how large, will be instantaneous. Thus, today’s AI supercomputers will be able to model the entire city’s activities in real time.
Geospatial intelligences (GEOINT) -
The drive to Smart City transformation entails all of the above mentioned technology into a relatively new discipline called Geospatial Intelligence (GEOINT), and it si being used extensively in attempting to manage the hoards of people in urban environments. GEOINT was originally conceived as a discipline by the U.S. military for military purposes of “mastering the Human Domain” on the battlefield.. The term was coined in 2011 by former Director of National Intelligence, Lt. Gen. James Clapper (USAF, Ret.). At the time, he was head of the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency in Springfield, Virginia. Here is the department’s original official definition:
GEOINT encompasses all aspects of imagery (including capabilities formerly referred to as Advanced Geospatial Intelligence and imagery-derived MASINT) and geospatial information and services (GI&S); formerly referred to as mapping, charging, and geodesy). It includes, but is not limited to data ranging from the ultraviolet through the microwave portions of the electromagnetic spectrum, as well as information derived from the analysis of literal imagery; geospatial data; georeferend social media; and information technically derived from the processing, exploitation, literal, and non-literal analysis of spectral, spatial, temporal, radiometric, phase history, polarimetric data, fused products (products created from two or more data sources), and the ancillary data needed for data processing and exploitation, and signature information (to include development, validation, simulation, data archival, and dissemination). These targets by electro-optical (to include IR, MWIR, SWIR TIR, programs (both active and passive) and non-technical means (To include geospatial information acquired by personnel in the field)).
GEOINT is closely related to the traditional concepts of geography where all immoveable features and objects in the landscape are mapped. Such fixed mapping allows us to reliably get from point A to point B on a consistent basis. Neither point A or B are expected to change locations. In a much broader context, GEOINT attempts to factor in all moveable objects, including cars, trucks and airplanes but most importantly, humans. Humans are never in the same place for very long, especially in modern society.
GEOINT literally maps the entire human domain and overlays it onto traditional mapping systems. By tracking the location of all people in the targeted system, they quickly subdivide into naturally associated groups and networks. These could represent any affiliations, political meetings, etc. When you observe people long enough with enough detail, not only do their personal patterns emerge, but also their relationships to the groups to which they belong are soon observed to follow their own patters.
What GEOINT attempts to do is locate the behavioral anomalies that would warrant closer analysis. The problem is that it demands knowledge of all normal behavior patterns and thus, total surveillance of all people. On the battlefield, for instance, imagine our military carefully watching a suspected enemy cell that might launch an attack. As long as normal patterns are observed, there is no alarm, but when a few of the members stray outside those patterns, it would indicate something unusual is happening. If those outliers were seen amassing ammunition, for instance, it would set off alarm bells.
Another key element to GEOINT is satellite and drone imagery. While these may not identify each individual, they can still note broader changes taking place in the overall landscape. Coupled with on-the ground intelligence, imagery can take on significant meaning.
Thanks to data-hungry Technocrat social engineers, civilian populations all over the world are now coming under the microscope of geospatial tracking and analysis, or GEOINT. The Smart City initiatives in America would be instantly regurgitated by cities if citizens understood that “Mastering the Human Domain” has them playing the part of the human domain to be mastered.
Notably, the field of GEOINT has grown so fast that 17 universities now have degree or certificate programs available, including Penn State, University of North Carolina, University of Maryland, University of Utah, University of Southern California, John Hopkins, George Mason University, University of Texas and University of Missouri. Many of these programs are a subsidiary of geography departments but with a crossover to Information Technologies.
One prominent GEOINT pioneer is Dr. Jerome E. Dobson, emeritus professor of geography at the University of Kansas, former Distinguished Research Fellow at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and President of American Geographical Society. Since the field of GEOINT was identified in 2011, Dobson has been considered a pioneer.
However, even before GEOINT was a defined discipline, Dobson wrestled with the ethical issues of his own field of Geographic Information Systems (GIS). In 2003, eight years before General Clapper’s declaration of GEOINT, Dobson wrote a paper with colleague Peter F. Fischer titled “Geoslavery”. They wrote:
“Human tracking devices, however, introduce a new potential for real-time control that extends far beyond privacy and surveillance, per se. As a result, society must contemplate a new form of slavery characterized by location control Geoslavery now looms as a real, immediate, and global threat.”
Society has failed to contemplate geoslavery, even though it has had amply opportunity and reason to do so. Concluding that geoslavery is the “ultimate fulfillment of George Orwell’s Big Brother nightmare”, they note that, instead of watching 20 or 30 people at a time, Location Based Services (LBS) can monitor thousands or even millions simultaneously. Today, as in China, we could raise the count to billions.
In the Smart City of tomorrow, people will indeed be living in a fishbowl: tracked, monitored, analyzed, nudged, limited and directed. They will be told what to think, how to think, when to think and how they are allowed to speak. Non-conformists will be conformed or shunned. Trouble-makers will simply be excluded altogether.
Excerpts from ‘Perceptions of a Renegade Mind’ by David Icke
Serfdom is so smart -
The Cult plan is far wider, extreme, and more comprehensive than most conspiracy researchers appreciate and I will come to the true depths of deceit and control in the chapters ‘Who controls the Cult?’ and ‘Escaping Wetiko’. Even the world that we know is crazy enough. We are being deluged with ever more sophisticated and controlling technology under the heading of ‘smart’. We have smart televisions, smart meters, smart cards, smart cars, smart driving, smart roads, smart pills, smart patches, smart watches, smart skin, smart borders, smart pavements, smart streets, smart cities, smart communities, smart environments, smart growth, smart planet… smart everything around us. Smart technologies and methods of operation are designed to interlcok to create a global Smart Grid connecting the entirety of human society including human minds to create a centrally -dictated ‘hive’ mind. ‘Smart cities’ is code for densely-occupied megacities of total surveillance and control through AI. Ever more destructive frequency communication systems like 5G have been rolled out without any official testing for health and psychological effects (colossal). 5G/6G/7G systems are needed to run the Smart Gird and each one becomes more destrcutive of body and mind. Deleting independent income is crucial to forcing people into these AI-policed prisons by ending private property ownership (except for the Cult elite). Te Cult’s Great Reset now openly foresees a global society in which no one will own any possessions and everything will be rented while the Cult would own literally everything under the guise of government corporations. The aim has been to use the lockdowns to destroy sources of income on a mass sacale and when the people are destitute and in unrepayable amounts of debt (problem) Cult assets come forward with the pledge to write-off debt in return for handing over all property and possessions (solution). Everything - literally everything including people - would be connected to the Internet via AI. I was warning years ago about the coming Internet of Things (IoT) in which all devices and technology from your car to your fridge would be plugged into the Internet and controlled by AI. Now we are already there with much more to come. The next stage is the Internet of Everything (IoE) which is planned to include the connection of AI to the human brain and body to replace the human mind with a centrally-controlled AI mind. Instead of perceptions being manipulated through control of information and censorship those perceptions would come direct from the Cult through AI. What do you think? You think whatever AI decides that you think. In human terms there would be no individual ‘think’ any longer. Too incredible? The ravings of a lunatic? Not at all. Cult-owned crazies in Silicon Vally have been telling us the plan for years without explaining the real motivation and calculated implications. These include Google executive and ‘futurist’ Ray Kurzwell who highlights the year 2030 for when this would be underway. He said:
“Our thinking … will be a hybrid of biological and non-biological thinking… humans will be able to extend their limitations and ‘think in the cloud’… We’re going to put gateways to the cloud in our brains… We’re going to gradually merge and enhance ourselves… In my view, that’s the nature of being human - we transcend our limitations.
As technology becomes vastly superior to what we are then the small proportion that is still human gets smaller and smaller and smaller until it’s just utterly negligible.”
The sales-pitch from Kurzweil and Cult-owned Silicon Valley is that this would make us ‘super-human’ when the real aim is to make us post-human and no longer ‘human’ in the sense that we have come to know. The entire global population would be connected to AI and become the centrally-controlled ‘hive-mind’ of externally-delivered perceptions. The Smart Grid being installed to impose the Cult’s will on the world is being constructed to allow particular locations - even one location - to control the whole global system. From these prime control centres, which absolutely include China and Israel, anything connected to the Internet would be switched on or off and manipulated at will. Energy systems would be cut, communication via the Internet taken down, computer-controlled driverless autonomous vehicles driven off the road, medical devices switched off, the potential is limitless given how much AI and Internet connections now run human society. We have seen nothing yet if we allow this to continue. Autonomous vehicle makes are working with law enforcement to produce cars designed to automatically pull over if they detect a police emergency vehicle flashing from up t 100 feet away. At the police stop the car would be unlocked and the window rolled down automatically. Vehicles would only take you where the computer (state) allowed. The end of petrol vehicles and speed limiters on all new cars in the UK and EU from 2022 are steps leading to electric computerised transport over which ultimately you have no control. The picture is far bigger even than the Cult global network or web and that will become clear when I get to the nature of the ‘spider’. There is a connection between all these happenings and the instigation of DNA-manipulating ‘vaccines (which aren’t vaccines) justified by the ‘Covid’ hoax. That connection is the unfolding plan to transform the human body from bilogical to a synthetic biological state and this is why synthetic biology is such a fast-emerging discipline of mainstream science. ‘Covid vaccines’ are infusing self-replicating genetic material into the cells to cumulatively take us on a Totalitarian Tiptoe from Human 1.0 to synthetic biological Human 2.0 which will be physically and perceptually attached to the Smart Grid to one hundred percent control everything thought, perception and deed. Humanity needs to wake up and fast.
This is the barest explanation of where the ‘outcome’ is planned to go but it’s enough to see the journey happening all around us. Those new to this information will already see 'Covid’ in a whole new context. I will add much more detail as we go along, but for the minutiae evidence see my mega-works, The Answer, The Trigger and Everything You Need to Know But Have Never Been Told.
[The book continues.]