The JFK Assassination: Commentary on Tucker Carlson's bombshell show on CIA's role

Ding, ding, ding, ding, ding! Bingo! Do global warming and 9/11 next, please.

The Assassination of John F. Kennedy

Well done Mr. Carlson, but what took you so long and now that you clearly know what you know, what will you do with this information? Please stay with it. Don’t bury it in last night’s segment and simply move on. In any case, thank you for speaking out and doing JFK’s assassination some justice on prime time - finally.

Do man-made global warming and 9/11 next, please.

https://rumble.com/v20xes8-tucker-carlson-tonight-thursday-december-15.html

---

The assassination of JFK was the perfect plan, with a near perfect execution, were it not for the unexpected amateur recording of the act itself by bystander Abraham Zapruder, who simply wanted to catch Camelot on film as it passed by. Once the existence of the now profoundly famous Zapruder Tape became known, Power swooped in to acquire and suppress the tape. Incidentally, Dan Rather is deeply implicated in the cover up. Not as a master-mind, but as a young and willing enabler.

It would take 12 long years for the Zapruder Tape to see the light of day, and for the American public to see, for the first time, footage that would directly contradict what they had been told. By the late seventies, polls indicated that an overwhelming majority of Americans believed the first Kennedy assassination had been a conspiracy. By the early nineties, multiple Congressional hearings had been conducted and dozens of books have been written on the assassination. The cumulative findings revealed in all of the above are explosive. But alas, the tape had been suppressed and enough time had passed for the situation to be managed and contained. The reality of that fateful event in Dallas on November 22nd 1963 and the full extent of its implications have been successfully kept under wraps below mainstream consciousness for sixty years.

Suppression, followed by the slow drip-feed of inconvenient facts over decades is a highly effective way of burying even the most shocking and incriminating acts in plain sight. It is a tactic Power uses all the time. By the same token, understanding this tactic, collating those disparate facts and assessing them in their totality from different angles for oneself all too often reveals the magnitude of the lies and, if not the full truth (always potentially unknowable), a much clearer picture; one that incontrovertibly exposes the extraordinary frauds and conspiracies perpetrated on We the People by our ruling Establishment.

Incidentally, and as Carlson says above, the very term ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ was first introduced into the vernacular in a serious way (clandestinely by the CIA) to discredit those questioning the so-called findings of the Warren Commission. Such revelations about fraud and criminal conspiracies on the part of our governments and our ruling class can, of course, come from reading good books where an author has already dedicated years of his or her life doing the hard work, researching and collating those facts for us. Facts hidden in the public domain and elsewhere, often against powerful opposition and even involving great risk to themselves. However, with respect to controversial subject-matter, one should always also “Do your own research”, to triangulate and independently verify what one is reading, as much as one can.

At a minimum, the Zapruder Tape unequivocally debunks the single-shooter-from-the-book-depository narrative and reveals the Warren Commission and its report as having been a complete sham. But the tape is only the beginning. We are meant to believe there are certain things in the political sphere we simply cannot know, supposedly because they are above our station, beyond our ability to understand, or simply unknowable. While parts of that statement are inherently true for everyone in life, Power plays with this to great effect. The ‘we’ in the above refers to you and me - We the People, or the little people. The ‘meant to believe’ refers to the things that actually are in fact readily knowable, but which Power wants to keep from us.

If you have not already done so, I promise that by reading and doing your own research, you can conclusively come to know much more about the first Kennedy assassination (and the second) than most people would imagine possible, and your conclusions will not only be better informed, they will be your own, as opposed to someone else’s. What you do come to know will make a mockery of the narratives we are ‘supposed’ to believe. This is true both in terms of how the assassination was executed on the day, and the fact that the subsequent Warren Commission was a cover-up effort. Beyond that, but still in plain sight are multiple suspects, elephant-sized motives, a web of damning relationships, preposterous coincidences, and inconsistencies all too numerous and too outlandish for the official version of events to be remotely believable. If that were not enough, too many of the most material ‘facts’ asserted by the Warren Commission do not stand up under even basic scrutiny.

While many specific details may never be unequivocally known, there’s enough evidence in what is known to make the big picture conclusion virtually inescapable for those who take the time to investigate: Forces within the United States government actively conspired amongst themselves, and almost certainly with industry, to assassinate a sitting president.

As I wrote that, I once again sensed that the typical Substack reader who finds this page will be thinking, “Tell me something I don’t already know.” But we quickly forget what it was like before we ourselves crossed some of these dark Rubicons. We should remember: You cannot see it, until YOU see it, and you have to find it for yourself. Of course, once you do, you can never unsee it. I certainly would have doubted anyone, had they told me the things I have learned in the Covid era about the JFK assassination. I first had to want to know the truth about it for myself, and then to find it for myself.

Once done, a kind of grieving process ensues. I think it is at least on par with the shock our parents described experiencing when they first heard of JFK’s assassination at the time, but possibly greater. I say greater because the realization that powerful forces in our government did such a thing and that they and the people behind them were also powerful enough to control the aftermath and prevent meaningful scrutiny across the mainstream media, the surviving Executive Branch, the Legislative Branch, the Judicial Branch and through six decades worth of presidential administrations since, is absolutely earth-shattering in its implications. It also happens to be true.

The JFK assassination is one of those big geopolitical questions where fundamentally opposing disagreements are fictitious constructs. Fictitious, because generally speaking, those holding diametrically opposed views on such matters are, in fact, seldom disagreeing on the actual subject-matter. Knowingly or not, they are typically disagreeing about which information sources to trust, as opposed to both sides having equal access and insight into all data points available and discussing and debating them on their merits.

I assert that it is a construct because the above dynamic is entirely by design with the media as the primary weapon of choice. I would wager that the vast majority of people who believe the Establishment narratives related to JFK’s assassination do so simply because that’s what they were told, repeatedly, by Power through Power’s media, and they never thought to seriously question and reexamine it. So, in essence and without even realizing it, they are actually merely defending Establishment authority, not engaging in a debate on the merits of the arguments. This is exactly as Power intends things to be - always.

There is one further crucial distinction in this, and that is that the vast majority of individuals on the conspiracy realist side are generally well versed in both sides of the argument. This is because they/we were all educated, indoctrinated, and brain-washed in the same Establishment bubble, with the same corrupt mainstream media, as everyone else. However, for whatever reason, perhaps because some of us have a healthy distrust of authority, or others because we saw one too many things presented in the media that rang flagrantly untrue, the conspiracy realists actively went beyond the Power-controlled bubble and began to research outside it.

However, conspiracy realists can and do return to that bubble regularly as part of trying to stay informed of what goes on there, as well as monitoring and holding the mainstream media to account. So, they typically know both sides of the argument well, precisely because they originally came from the other side and they/we certainly did not suffer amnesia as our knowledge and perspectives evolved.

The same is NOT true in reverse. Nine times out of ten, those defending Establishment narratives have NOT researched the countervailing views and arguments they think they oppose. Precisely because they have not wandered beyond the bubble, they do not know the merits of those arguments, and they are not willing to hear them. Most of them are simply unwittingly parroting Power’s script for Power’s sake. Then, when that script inevitably fails, they/we react as we have all been increasingly programmed by the media to instinctively deflect and avoid engaging in meaningful conversation. For instance, too many of us will seek to discredit the messenger or even resort to ad hominem from the outset: ‘He’s a racist. He’s a misogynist. She’s transphobic. He’s a conservative.’ (Did you see what I did there? Conspiracy realists saw it instantly. If you aren’t sure, you’re probably in the bubble.)

We’ve been conditioned to categorize ourselves into a myriad of different groups of victims and oppressors. By design, this makes it all too easy to presume those with differing views are not worth listening to. We write them off for being in the very categories we ourselves capriciously define and presumptuously assign them to, rather than affording them the benefit of the doubt as free-thinking individuals who may be arguing in good faith and have good points, which we could learn something from.

So, the debate is not real. It is contrived. It is an artificial construct. This is one of the most effective ways Power and the media divide We the People. It keeps us perpetually trapped in fights and arguments designed to continually distract us so we don’t look thoroughly at the substance of the issues, lest we might agree on more than we think or our disagreements may turn out to be not as disastrous or existential as we are led to believe. For as long as we are polarized against one another, we are not noticing what Power is doing (to us all) from above while they are keeping us distracted. I believe this is true, not just of the Kennedy assassination(s), but of every big issue of our time, including nearly every aspect of Covid-19 and its related narratives and oppressions.

If evil people in power would kill a US president in cold blood for their own cynical reasons, what wouldn’t they do? If they can control the aftermath, including the entire Establishment response and resulting general public perceptions, what can’t they control; especially now, with not just the legacy media, but also Big Tech in their pocket? If the media and our politicians are content to leave glaring questions with such profound implications on the table unchallenged, what wouldn’t they cover up for the Power that controls them? They answer to my questions here is, ‘not much’ or maybe ‘nothing’.

Many people believe that the JFK assassination represents the first time in modern democratic societies that enormous power, which lurks in the shadows showed its fangs to us all in the light of day. I am one of those people and the Covid era is just the latest and biggest example of this in a long and dark crescendoing shadow that has hung over the United States and democracy itself in the sixty years since JFK’s horrific murder. As it happens, several hours after I first drafted the above, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. posted this, so he clearly agrees:

Incidentally, did your legacy media give Carlson’s bombshell show serious coverage or did it denigrate it or merely ignore it? Maybe it belittled him instead? Never mind what they tell you they think of the man. What about even the smallest chance they must surely afford that he is right? In any case, surely he cannot be wrong for asking questions and restating facts already in the public domain, right? Given the seriousness of the subject-matter, would the circumstances not warrant some proper attention and reconsideration? They certainly would, assuming those outlets were remotely concerned with truth and public-interest news, as opposed to keeping things from us and manipulating our views in line with the agendas of their masters.

What about RFK Jr’s Tweet? The famous nephew of an assassinated President of the United States has (rightly) accused the CIA of murdering said president to orchestrate a coup d'état. If the media can ignore or dismiss such a statement from such a man, what can’t they ignore or dismiss? Answer: NOTHING.

That was a courageous post by Mr. Kennedy. Tucker Carlson obviously provided the perfect opportunity for such a statement. I could be mistaken, but I believe this may be the first time ever that RFK Jr has come out in public so strongly on this issue, and I’m so glad he did. I think we are witnessing history in the making that at least has the potential to be highly consequential in positive ways.

---

A Few Words on Big Tech Censorship - Yes, again!

I first drafted this post last night after I became aware of Tucker Carlson’s broadcast from a post made by Substack’s 2nd Smartest who had included someone’s YouTube video of the broadcast in his post. I try not to use YouTube very much anymore because I cannot stand it. I’m sure 2nd Smartest is the same. But I pasted the same link in my post here. As per normal, the video profile image appeared showing Carlson and the title of last night’s show, similar to one above, which I subsequently had to scramble to find on Rumble. That was because as I was finishing this post the YouTube video not only vanished before my very eyes when I refreshed my page, I saw it transform into something completely different, i.e., the link was not simply taken down. It was overtly commandeered and redirected by YouTube to different content. You can see the same on the above referenced 2nd Smartest post. It is impossible for a YouTube user to do such a thing by his or herself.

Check out this utter nonsense. This was a show where Carlson spoke truth to power like never before. Yet this here below is what the children at Google and YouTube decided to use to overwrite his exceptional journalism on the assassination of President Kennedy:

A few hours later, they even added a different thumbnail or profile of an actual Carlson broadcast from a different night over the above, in an obvious effort to make things a little less conspicuous.

I have often wondered what Big Tech and the US Government would do when Covid pretexts could no longer provide sufficient cover for their insatiable need to censor. I guess I now have part of my answer. They did not even pretend to take the Carlson video down under the bogus excuse of Community Guidelines, like they usually do, per the screenshot here below of one of my own videos of a London protest, which YouTube censored:

No, at this point, they are mocking We the People and democracy itself - brazenly. We are already very deep in the censorship rabbit hole, and have been for some time. On their current trajectory, things will only get worse. Much, much worse. There really is only one solution to this and the all-pervasive digital surveillance that poses a clear and existential threat to democracies and freedom everywhere. It’s as long overdue as it is unlikely to happen. Nevertheless, one can hope: By any and every means possible within the rule of law, YouTube and Big Tech writ large, as they are currently constructed, need to be destroyed and their current owners and overlords removed and investigated. These platforms then need to be rebuilt within the framework of democratic societies, not above and beyond them. And, no, I’m sorry, but Elon Musk is nobody’s savior. However, that’s a subject for another time.

---

Coming soon:

Man-made global warming and 9/11.